Page 425 of 562
Ste p 1
Example 1E xa mp le 2
Combined maximum we ight of occupants and
load (data from th e Ti re and Loading In fo rm ation
placard) 15 00 lbs (680 kg )1 500 lbs (680 kg )
Ste p 2
Example 1E xa mp le 2
Numb er of people in th e ve hicle (driver and
occupants) 51
Distribution of th e occupant sF ro nt: 2
Re ar: 3 Fr ont: 1
We ight of occupant sO ccupant 1: 15 0 lbs (68 kg )
Occupant 2: 18 0 lbs (82 kg )
Occupant 3: 16 0 lbs (73 kg )
Occupant 4: 14 0 lbs (63 kg )
Occupant 5: 12 0 lbs (54 kg ) Occupant 1: 200 lbs (91 kg )
To ta l we ight of all occupant s7 50 lbs (340 kg )2 00 lbs (91 kg ) Wheels and tires 423
Page 426 of 562
Ste p 3
Example 1E xa mp le 2
Pe rm issible load (maximum gros s ve hicle we ight
ra ting from th e Ti re and Loading In fo rm ation
placard minus th e gross we ight of all occupants) 15 00 lbs (680 kg )
Page 427 of 562
Ti re labeling
Overview of tire labeling
1
Uni fo rm Ti re Quality Grading St andard
( →
page 425)
2
DO T, Ti re Identification Nu mber
( →
page 426)
3
Maximum tire load ( →
page 427)
4
Maximum tire pressu re ( →
page 428) 5
Manufacturer 6
Characteristics of th e tire ( →
page 428)7
Ti re size designation, load-bea ri ng capacity,
speed ra ting and load ind ex ( →
page 428)8
Ti re name
Page 428 of 562
and one-half times as we ll on th e go ve rn ment
te st track as a tire graded 10 0.
The re lative per fo rm ance of tires depends upon
th e actual conditions of th eir use, ho we ve r, and
may depart significantly from th e norm due to
va ri ations in driving habits, service practices and
dif fe re nces in ro ad ch aracteristics and climate
conditions.
Tr action gr ade
q
DA NG ER Risk of accident due to inade‐
qu ate traction
The traction gr ade assigned to th is tire is
based on st ra ight-ahead braking traction
te st s, and does not include either accelera‐
tion, cornering, hy droplaning or peak traction
ch aracteristics.
Page 429 of 562